Muslim question in Europe: political controversies and public philosophies
Objektkategorie:
Elektronische Ressource
Person/Institution:
Verlag:
Temple University Press
Ort:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Entstehungszeit:
2016
Sprache:
Englisch
Weitere Objektinformationen
Abstract:
The book challenges the popular notion of a clash of cultures pitting Muslim and non-Muslim Europeans against one another. The study finds instead vehement conflict among three longstanding European public philosophies: liberalism, nationalism, and postmodernism. The consequential differences of outlook are demonstrated in four policy areas: 1) citizenship requirements, 2) the headscarf debate, 3) mosque-state relations and 4) counter-terrorism. The book reaches three important conclusions. First, Muslim Europeans do not represent a monolithic anti-Western bloc -- a Trojan Horse -- within Europe. They vehemently disagree among themselves but along the same basic liberal, nationalist, and postmodern contours as non-Muslim Europeans. Second, ideological discord significantly contributes to policy "messiness," that is, to inconsistent, contradictory policies. Third, both the discord and the messiness are remarkably similar from one European country to the next, thereby casting doubt on the dominant theory in comparative migration studies that posits distinct national styles such as French republicanism, German ethno-nationalism and British multiculturalism
The book challenges the popular notion of a clash of cultures pitting Muslim and non-Muslim Europeans against one another. The study finds instead vehement conflict among three longstanding European public philosophies: liberalism, nationalism, and postmodernism. The consequential differences of outlook are demonstrated in four policy areas: 1) citizenship requirements, 2) the headscarf debate, 3) mosque-state relations and 4) counter-terrorism. The book reaches three important conclusions. First, Muslim Europeans do not represent a monolithic anti-Western bloc -- a Trojan Horse -- within Europe. They vehemently disagree among themselves but along the same basic liberal, nationalist, and postmodern contours as non-Muslim Europeans. Second, ideological discord significantly contributes to policy "messiness," that is, to inconsistent, contradictory policies. Third, both the discord and the messiness are remarkably similar from one European country to the next, thereby casting doubt on the dominant theory in comparative migration studies that posits distinct national styles such as French republicanism, German ethno-nationalism and British multiculturalism
The book challenges the popular notion of a clash of cultures pitting Muslim and non-Muslim Europeans against one another. The study finds instead vehement conflict among three longstanding European public philosophies: liberalism, nationalism, and postmodernism. The consequential differences of outlook are demonstrated in four policy areas: 1) citizenship requirements, 2) the headscarf debate, 3) mosque-state relations and 4) counter-terrorism. The book reaches three important conclusions. First, Muslim Europeans do not represent a monolithic anti-Western bloc -- a Trojan Horse -- within Europe. They vehemently disagree among themselves but along the same basic liberal, nationalist, and postmodern contours as non-Muslim Europeans. Second, ideological discord significantly contributes to policy "messiness," that is, to inconsistent, contradictory policies. Third, both the discord and the messiness are remarkably similar from one European country to the next, thereby casting doubt on the dominant theory in comparative migration studies that posits distinct national styles such as French republicanism, German ethno-nationalism and British multiculturalism
Objekttext:
Peter O'Brien
Includes bibliographical references and index
Use copy Restrictions unspecified star MiAaHDL
Electronic reproduction
[S.l.] HathiTrust Digital Library 2011 Electronic reproduction |2011||||||||||
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.
English
Includes bibliographical references and index
Use copy Restrictions unspecified star MiAaHDL
Electronic reproduction
[S.l.] HathiTrust Digital Library 2011 Electronic reproduction |2011||||||||||
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.
English
Zugriff und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten
Administrative Angaben
Datensatz angelegt am:
2023-04-12
Zuletzt geändert am:
2022-03-11
In Portal übernommen am:
2023-04-12
Feedback
Unsere Datensätze befinden sich in stetiger Weiterentwicklung. Wenn Sie zusätzliche Informationen zu diesem Objekt oder einen Fehler entdeckt haben, dann schreiben Sie uns. Informationen zum Datenschutz
Ähnliche Objekte
Entdecken Sie ähnliche Objekte. Über die Datenfelder können Sie die Objekte auswählen, die Sie interessieren. Sie können Ihre Suchfilter beibehalten oder deaktivieren.
Suchfilter berücksichtigen
-
Objektkategorie:
- 1
-
Sprache:
- 1
-
Datenquelle:
- 1